For property managers & companies
Bring a consistent process to residential eviction work across your portfolio. Case records, review responsibilities, and next steps deserve a shared picture.
Prelaunch · Company capabilities are planned · Texas first
12
Case files
04
For review
03
Next actions
Alder Street
Unit 04
Oak Residences
Unit 12
Parkview Homes
Unit 08
Built around your operation
For residential property-management firms and rental ownership teams that want a consistent way to prepare records, review cases, and track next steps. Explore the planned portfolio workflow and tell us what your team needs.
Different properties do not mean identical cases. Ownership, records, court information, and approvals still need individual attention. The goal is a repeatable administrative workflow that helps your team see those differences, rather than hiding them.
Keep the property, tenant, and owning entity connected to the right case.
Design a process around the person preparing, reviewing, and authorizing each action.
Understand where a case stands and which records or confirmations are still needed.
Start with the right records
Built for residential owner-operators and third-party property managers. Start by connecting every case to the property, resident, and owning entity it belongs to. Shared preparation should preserve those boundaries.
For the rollout conversation, bring your counties, software, case volume, and approval responsibilities. Bulk intake and company access are planned; residential coverage will be confirmed county by county.
Keep originals. Identify missing information. Confirm details before using them in a packet.
AI assists. You review.
AI is designed to help extract facts from your documents, such as names, rent amounts, property details, and lease dates. In the product’s review workflow, those details are associated with source-document references so you can check where they came from.
Check the original document and the referenced page. A populated field is a starting point for review, not proof that the information is correct.
Edit a value that does not match your records. Missing or conflicting information needs your attention; it should not be silently treated as confirmed.
AI does not write legal text or choose your legal strategy. The product is designed to populate versioned templates, with your review and any required approvals before use.
Illustrations show the intended workflow. Live AI and filing integrations remain subject to launch readiness.
Lease.pdf
Sample document · 8 pages
Jordan Taylor
$1,600
1420 Alder Street
Extracted details still need your confirmation.
Illustrative review screen, not a live product session.
The portfolio workflow
Bulk intake and team seats are planned. These previews explain the approach, not a live feature release.
The planned bulk-intake experience checks property references, units, tenants, balances, and case types. The aim is to identify records that need attention before they become case files.
For launch, supported import formats and provider connections still need confirmation. Each case retains its own review, court confirmation, and authorization requirements.
Portfolio intake.csv
Illustrative bulk review
Importing records does not authorize filing.
Bulk capabilities are planned; availability is not announced.
Planned · Team workflow
Prepare
Gather records and review populated details.
Review
Check missing information and the packet for the individual case.
Authorize
Confirm the documents and charges before submission.
Track
Record updates and keep the next action visible.
Specific permissions, access boundaries, and approval routing will be confirmed before release.
Different ownership entities, tenants, and properties need clearly separated records. Tell us how your portfolio is structured so we can assess the planned workflow. Company ownership does not imply support for commercial-tenant evictions.
Each case can involve its own court, fees, delivery records, and updates. Keep notice delivery distinct from court citation service. Attorneys and process servers are independent professionals; the company retains responsibility for its decisions.
Tell us which property-management tools you use and which records you need to move between systems. No named integrations or API connections are promised on this page. Eviction Wizard focuses on case organization and tracking rather than replacing your entire property-management operation.
Manage the exceptions
The planned operating model keeps changes attached to the individual case and its responsible people. These examples show what a team needs to review—not automated legal decisions.
Payment received
Update the resident’s records and route the case back to the responsible reviewer. Batch preparation should never obscure a payment, settlement, or changed instruction.
Missing authorization
Identify the owning entity and the person responsible for approval. Company access alone should not be treated as authority to file or appear for an owner.
Returned filing
Keep the clerk’s reason connected to the affected case. Review changes and renewed authorization separately from other files in the batch.
Service pending
Distinguish a requested service, a reported attempt, and a return of service. Keep court citation records separate from prefiling notice-delivery records.
Hearing information
Use the court-provided information and identify who must confirm it and handle attendance. A portfolio calendar is an administrative aid, not court representation.
Legal review needed
Flag disputed facts, appeals, bankruptcy documents, or special property-program requirements for the appropriate reviewer and independent counsel.
Authority & accountability
Identify who owns the property, who can authorize action, and who may appear in the relevant court. Representation rules depend on the jurisdiction, court, and stage; confirm them before assigning a team member.
Keep the notice, delivery date, method, and supporting proof. The appropriate notice and delivery requirements depend on the case.
The court issues the citation. Service follows the court’s rules and is performed by an authorized person. Store the service record separately.
The court issues court documents and authorized law enforcement handles enforcement. A dashboard status does not itself restore possession.
Texas’s revised Rule 510 applies to eviction lawsuits filed on or after January 1, 2026. Use current official rules and court information when confirming requirements. Other-state coverage and a reviewed representation comparison will be added as availability is confirmed.
Read the Texas Supreme Court amendment orderData & existing systems
During rollout planning, map which system holds the lease, ledger, owner details, and resident identifiers. Agree on the source for each field and how changes should return to the case record.
CSV formats, named PMS integrations, APIs, webhooks, and SSO are not confirmed launch capabilities. Tell us your systems and required data flows so the proposed import approach can be evaluated.
Evaluate before rollout
Confirm supported counties, access boundaries, approval responsibilities, resident-data handling, retention, support, and pricing before onboarding. Request written details for controls your organization requires.
Security certifications, service-level commitments, owner portals, exports, and onboarding timelines are not advertised as available. Open-case migration and training needs belong in the rollout discussion.
A record you can follow
The app’s case history distinguishes court updates, vendor information, user-reported events, and system records. A visible source helps a team understand what is confirmed and what needs another look.
Source
Court, vendor, landlord, attorney, or system: the origin of an update matters.
Status
Expected information and confirmed events should be distinguishable.
Next action
A reminder is an administrative aid. Case-specific legal decisions stay with you and your attorney.
Plan a thoughtful rollout
Tell us your counties, portfolio size, expected case volume, team roles, and existing software. Those details help us discuss fit, launch availability, and the capabilities your team actually needs.
Company packages and volume pricing are not published. We will confirm supported counties, integrations, and access controls before representing them as available.
Your rollout conversation
A little more detail
Bulk preparation, multiple entities, permissions, and rollout: the questions behind a company’s decision.
Read the general product FAQEviction Wizard is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or representation. You are responsible for reviewing your documents and deciding how to proceed.
This is attorney advertising. It is not legal advice and does not constitute a lawyer referral service. See full disclaimer →